Tuesday, March 17, 2020
Poussinistes Vs. Rubenistes essays
Poussinistes Vs. Rubenistes essays The debate between Poussinistes vs. Rubenistes began in the French Academy. The debate was between the artistic ideas of Poussin and Ruben. The Poussinistes thought that drawing and the use of lines were more important than color because it appeals to the mind the most. The Rubenistes believed that color was the most important factor in paintings over line because it is more true to nature. They believed that color appeals to everyone as opposed to line, which appeals to only a selected few. A good example of a painting that the Poussinistes would have believed to be true to their beliefs would be Sir Joshua Reynolds portrait of Mrs. Siddons As the Tragic Muse. This painting really shows its sense of lines because, in the painting, Mrs. Siddons is outlined very well. There are also the hard outlines of the straight chair that she is sitting on to give her sort of a frame. The background is very dark and kind of fades out. There is, of course, color in the painting but no color that is very bright and eye catching. One is mostly focused on the object that is painted due to the actual figure represented rather than the color that is used. A good example of a painting that the Rubenistes would have believed to be true to their beliefs would be Jean- Antoine Watteaus painting of A Pilgrimage to Cyhera. This painting is a good example for on because it has a wonderful display and use of color. In this painting you can make out clearly what the artist is trying to represent, yet there are no hard lines that deeply outline any of the figures. The colors in the painting softly blend into each as if they are one color bringing on many different hues. The sky becomes the mountains, which become the trees and the lake and eventually the people. The color really draws your attention and creates an interesting sense of beauty. If I were around in the time of the French Academy I pro ...
Saturday, February 29, 2020
A Current Event Essay
After the United States bombed Japan in World War Two, Korea was divided into two countries: North and South Korea. The economy in each country had different outcomes, which prevented and complicated these two countries coming back together. The US and five other countries, including North and South Korea, were involved in the Six Party Talks to try to combine the two conflicting countries. In 2005, North Korea was afraid it was giving away to much information about their nuclear weapons and they withdrew from the Six Party Talk. Although the United States has participated in talks with North Korea before, the US should engage in talks with them because they need to make a decision that will affect the country by preventing starvation or saving their nuclear weapons program. As stated in the New York Times, ââ¬Å"Almost one out of two children is chronically malnourished North Korea runs a shortage of one million tons of food a yearâ⬠(Sang-Hun). The United States should engage in talks with North Korea because their people are the ones suffering due to lack of nutrition. The government should understand that the future of North Korea wouldnââ¬â¢t look too bright with a smaller population and residents that are more angered than today. Also, since this country is under a dictatorship, the people have no input on topics, such as this one, that can help the bulk of their people. If the government were to continue to go against the people, an uprising should be expected and to other countries this wouldnââ¬â¢t come as a shock. With the help of the United States, the US can compromise with the North Korean government and supply aid for the deprived people. Not only is it in the best interest for the North Koreans, but for their government to negotiate to keep themselves in power. Another worry for the United States is North Korea has possession of nuclear weapons. As stated in the New York Times, ââ¬Å"Since six-party talks ended, North Korea has detonated a nuclear device and tested a long-range rocket that may one day be able to carry nuclear warheads ââ¬Å" (Knowlton and Sang-Hun). With having this as a ââ¬Å"safetyâ⬠or backup, Kim Jung IL is believed to have sold nuclear parts to Iran and Syria. Whatââ¬â¢s even worse is North Korea has the choice to sell their nuclear materials to Al Qaeda. The United States is concerned that if Al Qaeda were to possess these materials, they could create nuclear weapons and use this to hurt other countries, such as the US and Israel. Al Qaeda has no guilt for hurting large masses of people, so firing these VERY dangerous weapons, and killing people, wouldnââ¬â¢t be on their conscious. If the United States were to engage in talks with North Korea, they could compromise on dismantling their nuclear weapons, and could prevent nuclear materials from getting into the wrong hands. In conclusion, the United States would be making the right decision to engage in talks with North Korea for the sake of their starving people and from keeping nuclear materials out of the hands of Al Qaeda. This would help secure our safety and could potentially give the United States another ally in Asia. North Koreans are starving and with out the nuclear weapons they receive aid, if North Korea were to keep their nuclear weapons the civilians continue to starve. Brian Knowlton and Choe Sang-Hun, New U. S. Envoy to Talk With North Koreans, New York Times, October 19, 2011. Choe Sang-Hun, Head of U. N. Humanitarian Aid Paints Dire Scene in North Korea, New York Times, October 24, 2011
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Canadas Involvement in Defeating the Apartheid System Essay
Canadas Involvement in Defeating the Apartheid System - Essay Example It became more apparent when the South African government implemented the apartheid system. The series of events demonstrating the evil effects of the brutal policy had caught the attention of powerful and rich countries like United States and Canada. Together with the other concerned states, the Canadian government extended social, political, and economic support to the black people in South Africa. With its heterogeneous population, Canada was considered to have an essential role in thwarting the principles advanced by the apartheid system. The Apartheid System and its Justification The apartheid system refers to ââ¬Å"the separation of racesâ⬠in almost every aspect of life (Edwards n. pag.). Under this system, there is segregation with regard to the following: (1) education (2) medical care (3) transportation (4) housing (5) employment (6) voting and (7) public accommodation (Edwards). Its main thrust is to prevent the other races from enjoying the areas of life which are only meant for the white race. In the eyes of the minority white government, the implementation of the Apartheid policy is a necessary precondition in attaining a good political structure. The government believes that this objective is only achievable if there will be peace throughout the South African community. For the minority white, a peaceful co-existence will only truly happen if there would be separation of races (Edwards n. pag.). For them, there should be social, political, and economic segregation between the different races in South Africa. It would seem that the ruling whites are irritated and disgusted with the presence of dark-skinned individuals within the South African community. Apparently, the government uses the physical attributes of the blacks as an excuse to its inefficient delivery of essential public services. For the white leaders, good governance would mean racial segregation. In such case, it is their belief that a smooth flow of interaction between the various agencies of the government would only be feasible through the apartheid system. This is buttressed by the fact that the whites are the dominant race in South Africa when the apartheid policy was introduced in 1948 (ââ¬Å"Apartheid Eraâ⬠). Canadian Diplomacy It is a generally accepted principle in international law that if a certain issue is of national scope, the other nations are not supposed to interfere with the subject state. However, in actuality, there are national issues which need a worldwide intervention; the apartheid in South Africa is a good example. When the apartheid policy of the South African government became a global issue, many states extended their support as in the case of Canada. Just like the other concerned states, the Canadian government also tried diplomacy to defeat the apartheid system. Diplomacy, as an art of dialogue and negotiation, was used by Canada to gain support from the other states and weaken the government of South Africa (ââ¬Å"Diplomacyâ⬠). The negotiation effort was personally handled by the countryââ¬â¢s Prime Minister, Martin Brian Mulroney. Canada, represented by Mulroney, vigorously advanced the situation in South Africa within the Commonwealth of Nations; in turn, the organization supported Mulroneyââ¬â¢s conviction and imposed a new condition for membership -- a state must at all times respect racial equality (ââ¬Å"Canadaââ¬â¢s Roleâ⬠). Nevertheless, with such condition at hand, the South African government still did not dismantle the apartheid. Instead, it left the Commonwealth in 1961 and became a republic (ââ¬Å"United Statesââ¬
Saturday, February 1, 2020
Telecom Sector report Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words
Telecom Sector report - Research Paper Example persistent security challenges, robust growth in connectivity demand and continued innovation in services and devices that are utilized in the communication industry. Continued innovation and emergence of new technology has been of essence to the industry as the industry approaches maximum penetration into the United States market. It will be a challenge for the telecom industry to repeat the high performance that were registered in the past ten years as mergers yield higher concentration and consolidation of the players. The management of the telecom industry has hopes that the new technology and innovation will continue to create new opportunities as well as growth of the industry. The industry has recorded $ 750 billion of revenue across all segments. The revenue is expected to grow by +3.9% every year to reach almost 1.2 trillion dollars in total revenue (Huemann, 2014). As the number of the telecom segments continues to grow and penetrate into the market, growth over the next 10 years is more likely to slow as to nearly half of the growth that was registered in the last ten years even though the revenue is expected to increase by over $ 40 billion. The United States telecommunication industry encompasses advanced technology based services that includes the internet, wireless communication, satellites and fiber optics in addition to the traditional areas of local and long distance telephone services. The sector is also linked with entertainment of various types. Cable TV systems for example Comcast are offering high speed internet access and local telephone services. This paper will provide returns of the telecom industry; provide financial analysis, present tables and graphs showing the valuation multipliers, provide a description of telecom sector and discuss the social and economic factors that impact on the performance of the industry. Innovation, ingenuity, reasonable approach to spending and cost control will help propel the industry to the next level
Friday, January 24, 2020
Emotional And Rational Appeals :: essays research papers
Emotional and Rational Appeals Abstract In many studies, data has been led to suggest that rational messages may encourage the generation of content based cognitive responses and lead to attitudes heavily influenced by these cognitions. Studies have also led to suggest that people in negative moods are affected by the quality of persuasive messages. Using manipulations techniques, bad mood may result in a different interpretation of anything from a verbal argument to a literal message. Even though most studies indicate that good mood manipulations may not have that much effect on one's perception of a scenario, further investigation may do away with that theory. Persuasion in Response to Emotional and Rational Appeals à à à à à Much research has been done to try and indicate that emotional appeals may influence attitude change. The other side of looking at the spectrum is that rational appeals may do likewise (e.g., Rosselli; Francine; Skelly, John J.; Mackie, Diane M, 1995). In one study conducted at the University of California at Santa Barbara, 184 students received partial course credit in return for their participation. Subjects in the experiment were assigned to the cells of a 2(positive or neutral mood) x 2(emotional or rational message type) x 2(strong or weak argument quality). Subjects were in groups of two to six. After this step was established, eight messages in approximately equal length were developed. Each message contained six arguments that were either in favor or against using animals for research purposes. Rational and emotional were used in nature and strong and weak were used in quality. In the procedure of the experiment, subjects participated in an experimental session that included several tasks that were not directly related to the study. The first test included a survey of the subjects' attitudes toward animal testing. After this was completed, subjects read a persuasive message, then responded to questions concerning the topic of animal research, and finally completed items designed to check the effectiveness of the manipulations. à à à à à After checking the analysis, indications showed that there was no effects for gender. To add to this, responses to all manipulation check measures were entered into one of four separate groups between subjects analyses of variance (ANOVAs). When looking at the message type, the data had revealed the expected main effect for message type, F(1, 65) = 33.44. p
Wednesday, January 15, 2020
Cultural Assimilation Essay
With globalization and peopleââ¬â¢s living quality advancing dramatically, every year, American universities welcome tens of thousands of international students from all over the world. The land of freedom and justice has opened its doors to those who seek new options and better opportunities and sometimes it asks for certain changes and adjustments fir those who come to study aboard. When these international students pursues higher education in US, fulfilling their life experience and learning something new from American culture, they too bring with them elements of international experience to an American university. Taking up a considerable portion of student population in the university, international students face difficulties to assimilate with local students, particularly in terms of linguistic and cultural differences. International student struggles to become one with the world around him. Some popular cultural studies experts believed it is best for students from all over the world who come to the United States and lose their cultural identity and ââ¬Å"meltâ⬠into or assimilate into the American culture. Assimilation occurs in many different ways in our universities, and it is unfortunately, a part of life that we all international students have to learn to accept, no matter the consequences. According to various critics, the process of assimilation occurs in two distinct forms: Language and Culture. My paper will demonstrate the distinction between these two types of assimilation, arguing that language assimilation is necessary, but cultural assimilation can be problematic or damaging. I, being an international student feel that most important aspect of assimilation that an international student faces is language. In American society, learning to speak English properly is a crucial factor and is a form of assimilation. However, people who have decided to come to America to study have found it rather difficult to assimilate into American society for several reasons. International students are forced into an English ââ¬â speaking classroom and expected to assimilate to the local language with very little help of the educators. The educators are not be blame, the demand for teachers is extremely high and the teachers we have fill the gaps, whether they share a language with their students or not. Linguistic assimilation is important for international students but they should keep in mind that they should not completely melt in other language, which results in eradication of their cultural language. This situation is perfectly portrayed by Salman Rushdie in his essay ââ¬Å"ââ¬ËCommonwealth Literatureââ¬â¢ doesnââ¬â¢t existâ⬠that discusses the conflicts in India over the English language. Salman Rushdie in his essay ââ¬Å"ââ¬ËCommonwealth Literatureââ¬â¢ doesnââ¬â¢t existâ⬠discusses the conflicts in India over the English language. Some in India see English as the language of British imperialism and believe that it shouldnââ¬â¢t be used. Others disagree because the language that is proposed to replace English in everyday use is Hindi, which has strong connections to religion, which are not universally accepted. Rushdie states that this ideological divide is mostly between the north and south of India. He sums up his position by saying, ââ¬Å"â⬠¦it is completely fallacious to suppose that that there is such a thing as a pure, unalloyed tradition from which to drawâ⬠(pp. 2541). Rushdie believes that language is an essential part of expr essing culture. He explains that, though Indian and British literature are written in English but they are distinct from one another and that just because they share a common language doesnââ¬â¢t diminish the value of the Indian culture. Rushdie acknowledges the growing importance of global trade and that English is well suited to serve as its communication medium. There is essential technical and scientific vocabulary that is used regularly in international exchanges that have no analog in local languages, such as Hindi. He believes that India needs to continue to embrace English, in order to remain competitive in the global community. Rushdieââ¬â¢s idea of embracing language that is common in the society perfectly exemplifies that international students should embrace a common language which is common in the university in order to stay in competition with home students and communicate their ideas. I have personally experience this situation in my university. So, in order to express thoughts, we (international students) will have to learn a common medium of communication. But learning a different mode of communication should not result into extinction of their cultural language. Rushdie tries to portray that international students should not completely evaporate into the new language and forget about their own mother tongue. We should assimilate into new language but should always respect their cultural language more then other Languages, as according to him ââ¬Å"language is an essential part of expressing cultureâ⬠. Linguistic assimilation as Rushdie shows often comes from coercion and force from outside, but can be necessary for simple survival. This argument is perfectly exemplified by Ngugi Wa Thiongââ¬â¢o in his essay ââ¬Å"Decolonizing the mindâ⬠(1986) who tells us of when he was a grade school student in Kenya. The British declared marshal law over the country in the middle of the last century and in an attempt to curb the rebellion and insurgency, they decreed that English was to the sole language spoken. Suddenly Ngugi had to learn English and couldnââ¬â¢t speak the language of his people at school. These experiences shaped Ngugi opinions about the role that language fills. He is of the opinion that language serves two distinct purposes. One is for communication (Pg. 3). He gives the example of how the different cultures in eastern Africa use Swahili to communication with among each other but use their own language when communicating among their own kind. The other role it fills is that of a medium to express ones culture. Different culture tailors different language to convey and pass down its traditions (Pg. 4). Ngugi argument about Language serves two distinct purposes is true for International students as they use ââ¬Å"Englishâ⬠language as a common medium of communication whereas use their ââ¬Å"mother tongueâ⬠as a medium of expressing their culture. ââ¬Å"What a common language does for one person, it does for all societyâ⬠, this is perfectly illuminated in an article from international journal on Minority and group rights. According to article, ââ¬Å"Effective participation in politics as well as the market economy requires t he development of common vernacular expressions, the free flow of information, and established codes of communication. All of these exchanges are enhanced when individuals speak the same languageâ⬠. The critic of the article, Chih-Yu Shih says that if fixed proportion of population does not speak the common language, the reach of the state and the market will, in turn, shrink. This is both because communication from one language to another can translate into different meanings and because different language structures themselves reflect diverse perspectives proportion of the population cannot speak the national language, the reach of the state and the market will, in turn, shrink. This is both because communication from one language to another can translate into different meanings and because different language structures themselves reflect diverse perspectives of modernity. To learn a different language is to learn a different lifestyle., international students will have to learn different languages in order to be in reach of state. International Students studying and competing with the local will need to communicate with them, which is only possible if they have a common mode of language. So, in order to remain in touch with the local students and professor, students will have to learn language, which is common. After going through the essays of Rushdieââ¬â¢s, Ngugie and Chih-Yu Shih, we could say that language assimilation makes sense but authors like Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz and Richard Rodriguez says that cultural assimilation is also important. They think that cultural assimilation is very important part of linguistic assimilation as ââ¬Å"Language express culturalâ⬠. According to them, oneââ¬â¢s traditions such as cultural traditions also have an effect on the willingness and on the degree to which one assimilates. Few international students have found that certain customs like social behaviors which may surprise, offend or offend others; eating food which may seem heavy or bland compared have not been accepted in American culture and might even be condemned. A student who has different traditions than Americans may be frowned upon and may be discriminated against because of the difference. I had experienced this situation as I was discriminated in my folklore class by my follow student. After experiencing this, a question came in my mind that why on a practical level itââ¬â¢s useful to assimilate but on an ethical level, itââ¬â¢s questionable? Sacrificing oneââ¬â¢s traditions is a problematic concept even if it means that someone could blend into mainstream culture. International students will have to stick to there own cultures and tradition while assimilating. But this is not the case every time! Some students while assimilating forget about his own cultures and traditions and easil y jolt into others cultures. Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz states a similar situation in her essay ââ¬Å"Hispanics in Americaâ⬠. She reveals the social position of the Hispanics in American society. She says that instead of letting Hispanics follow their own culture and traditions, they are forced to follow the lifestyles of Americans. As only an ââ¬Å"American way of lifeâ⬠existed, Hispanics had to follow the same path of that of the white folks, but also were rarely competing with the dominating white race. Though the Hispanics are the biggest minority group in American society today, their native language and other cultural aspects were scornfully ignored according to Isasi-Diaz, which made assimilation a difficult task for Hispanics. Similarly argument is state by Richard Rodriguez who discusses about culture in America. Rodriguez says, ââ¬Å"I am in favor of assimilation. I am not in favor of assimilation. I recognize assimilation.â⬠By making these statements, Rodriguez is saying that he accepts what is happening in regards to culture in America. While he isnââ¬â¢t completely for or again st what is going on, and he isnââ¬â¢t even trying to change it, he is accepting it and working with it. While saying this he doesnââ¬â¢t mean that racial and ethnic distinctions do not matter anymore in America, he thinks that differences are becoming a part of everyday life and they are just so common now that it really isnââ¬â¢t such a big dealâ⬠. In this essay, Rodriguez states, ââ¬Å"I do think distinctions exist.â⬠Throughout the rest of the essay, Rodriguez goes into great detail of how he understands distinctions exist and how it is changing America. So, this is evident from both the essay that international students will have to blend into America culture in order to compete with American folks in the universities. But blending should not mean that completely giving up their original culture. It means that assimilating into different culture with maintaining the same love for original culture. In conclusion, it is wise to note that both forms of assimilation is adopted by international assimilation in some or the other way. Few international students have over years adopted their ââ¬Å"hostâ⬠cultureââ¬â¢s language, while maintaining their own traditions, customs and values. This common form of communication can also present more opportunities for cross-cultural understanding. International students get to learn many things if they can communicate in a common language. In terms of bilingual education: bilingual education provides the opportunity for a student to use the language that they have grown up with in school while learning another. This permits the student to retain and embrace their language and by extension the culture associated with it. As an old Czech proverb states, ââ¬Å"learn a new language and get a new soulâ⬠.
Tuesday, January 7, 2020
United Arab Emirates Vegas Of The Middle East - 1295 Words
United Arab Emirates: Vegas of the Middle East When you think of history, you think of millenniums and centuries passed through time with experiences and tragic tales of the rising and falling of empires and civilizations. The United Arab Emirates has defied the odds of history. The UAE has embraced the western civilization approach of capitalism which contrasts to a traditional Middle Eastern country. The thriving nation of the UAE gained its independence from the United Kingdom in the early 1970ââ¬â¢s. The small yet intriguingly stunning country has not let traditional Islam principles hinder its political or economic growth. In just over four decades, the United Arab Emirates has successfully transformed from one of the worldââ¬â¢sâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦This young nationââ¬â¢s government is commonly referred to as a Federal Supreme Council, which is a presidential elected monarchy. Each emirate has its own ruler or absolute monarch. The president of the UAE is then elected from one of the nationââ¬â¢s seven absolute monarchs. Since most of the population of the UAE is located in the emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, the recent presidents have come from those emirates. The presidential election is determined by the UAEââ¬â¢s equivalent of our nationââ¬â¢s congress, the Federal Supreme Council. The Federal Supreme Council is the head policy-making body within the United Arab Emirates. This assembly plays a vital role for the government due to the fact that they have both legislative and executive powers. Since gaining independence from the United Kingdom in 1971, the UAE has shockingly had only two hereditary presidents. Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan held the presidency from the time the nation was founded until his death on November 2nd, 2004. Following the death of the UAEââ¬â¢s beloved leader, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyah was elected to take his place on November 3rd, 2004 and still holds the presidency today. In ad dition to the previously mentioned Supreme Council, the UAE also has a Council of Ministers as well as a Federal National Council. None other than the Prime Minister who is the monarch of the emirate Abu Dhabi leads the Council of Ministers. The Federal National Council is comprised of 40 members of society elected
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)